I'm with you on consolidation and centralizing guidance, but I don't have much faith in the EDPB as a body when it comes to this effort. The last few guidance documents/opinions have been a hot mess of maximalism and 'IDK, you guys figure it out' regulatory punting. That said, I don't know if there's a better body for this task.
I don't think it can be anyone other than EDPB but they do have to grow a spine. But they probably need a lot more resources (which probably impacts guidance quality somewhat as well)!
Yes. On all fronts. More resources, and broader technical expertise. I think they have the law reasonably understood, but my God, some of their assumptions on what technology can and cannot do are deeply flawed.
To their credit, I did appreciate the roundtable on AI, even if they didn't incorporate most of the technical suggestions.
I'm with you on consolidation and centralizing guidance, but I don't have much faith in the EDPB as a body when it comes to this effort. The last few guidance documents/opinions have been a hot mess of maximalism and 'IDK, you guys figure it out' regulatory punting. That said, I don't know if there's a better body for this task.
Maybe more/different people doing the work?
I don't think it can be anyone other than EDPB but they do have to grow a spine. But they probably need a lot more resources (which probably impacts guidance quality somewhat as well)!
Yes. On all fronts. More resources, and broader technical expertise. I think they have the law reasonably understood, but my God, some of their assumptions on what technology can and cannot do are deeply flawed.
To their credit, I did appreciate the roundtable on AI, even if they didn't incorporate most of the technical suggestions.